EDUCATION FOR ALL IN THE CARIBBEAN IN THE 1900s RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT

The production of the EFA in the Caribbean Monograph Series was in part facilitated by a financial contribution from the UNFPA Caribbean Regional Office. UNESCO 2000 The ideas and opinions expressed in this work are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of UNESCO. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in the publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. FOREWORD Education for All in the Caribbean: Assessment 2000 is a remarkable output, which is educational and cultural experience of the sub-region; a knowledge which is critical to the understanding of the unfolding social and economic developments. UNESCO is pleased to have been associated with this endeavour, particularly through our regional office in Kingston, Jamaica which, as coordinator of the Regional Advisory Group for the Caribbean Sub-region, was integrally involved in every aspect of the exercise. We look forward to continued collaboration with the Caribbean on activities of a mutually rewarding nature as the consequences and implications of the EFA Assessment become manifest. At Jomtien in 1990, member states of the United Nations adopted the Framework for Action to Meet Basic Learning Needs and created the International Consultative Forum on Education for All (EFA Forum). One decade later, the EFA Forum embarked on an assessment of this initiative, intended to assist member states in examining their education provisions to inform the formulation of policy. Once the Caribbean EFA Regional Advisory Group had embarked seriously on the assessment, it was quickly realised that it would be difficult to capture, in any one place, an assessment of all that had transpired in education in the Caribbean during the period 1990-1999. Moreover, the technical guidelines constrained assessors to specifics within quantitative and qualitative frames. However, because it was felt that education in the Caribbean is too dynamic to be circumscribed, the idea of a more wide-ranging monograph series was conceived. Researchers, education practitioners, and other stakeholders in education were invited to contribute to the series. Our expectations were that the response would be quite moderate, given the short time-frame within which we had to work. Instead, we were overwhelmed by the response, both in terms of the number of enthusiastic contributors and the range of …